Virtuasys
ConnectivityEnterprise Fiber
  • Multi-site & LAN2LAN
  • SD-WAN
IP & NetworkTier 1 Connectivity
  • DDoS Protection
  • IPv4 / IPv6 / ASN
  • BGP & Peering
All network services→
Datacenter & CloudHousing
  • Cloud
  • Bare Metal Servers
  • VPS SSD NVMe
View All Services→Check eligibility
GuidesAboutContact
Customer Portal
  • Enterprise Fiber
  • Multi-site & LAN2LAN
  • SD-WAN
  • Tier 1 Connectivity
  • DDoS Protection
  • IPv4 / IPv6 / ASN
  • BGP & Peering
  • All network services
  • Housing
  • Cloud
  • Bare Metal Servers
  • VPS SSD NVMe
GuidesAboutContact
View All Services→Check eligibility
Customer Portal
  1. Home
  2. Services
  3. Connectivity
  4. Network Tunneling Technologies

Network Tunneling Technologies: GRE, VXLAN, IPsec & WireGuard Explained

Byte-for-byte overhead and measured 10 Gbps throughput for all four protocols, so you pick the right one before you provision.

Tunneling underlays our connectivity services for multi-site networking, SD-WAN and data center interconnect.

Complete Comparison Table

Side-by-side technical comparison of all four protocols

FeatureGREVXLANIPsecWireGuard
RFC/StandardRFC 2784RFC 7348RFC 4301RFC 9180 draft
OSI LayerLayer 3Layer 2 over L3Layer 3Layer 3
EncryptionNoneNoneAES-256-GCMChaCha20
AuthenticationNoneNonePSK/CertificatesPublic key
MTU Overhead24 bytes50 bytes60-90 bytes60 bytes
Performance5/5 stars4/5 stars3/5 stars5/5 stars
ConfigurationSimpleComplexVery complexVery simple
Multicast SupportYesYesNoNo
NAT TraversalPoorGoodNeeds NAT-TExcellent
Security LevelNoneNoneExcellentExcellent
Primary Use CaseMPLS, internalData centerEnterprise VPNModern VPN
CPU ImpactVery lowLowHighVery low
Maturity30 years12 years25 years5 years

Virtuasys Tunneling Solutions

Every protocol below, deployed and supported on our network

What We Offer

  • GRE Tunnels: internal datacenter connectivity over private networks
  • VXLAN: data center network virtualization and Layer 2 DCI
  • IPsec VPN: enterprise site-to-site connectivity with AES-256-GCM
  • WireGuard: modern VPN for performance-critical applications

Our Approach

  • Protocol selection guidance from our network engineering team
  • 24/7 monitoring and support for tunnel health, latency and packet loss
  • Hardware crypto acceleration for IPsec (Intel QAT, AES-NI)
  • Integrated with our SD-WAN solutions for intelligent multi-path routing
  • Part of comprehensive multi-site connectivity packages

The 4 Protocols

One line each; full specs in the comparison table above

GRE (Generic Routing Encapsulation)

RFC 2784, unencrypted IP-in-IP tunnel from 1994, 24 bytes of overhead, still the simplest way to carry multicast routing protocols over a private link.

VXLAN (Virtual Extensible LAN)

RFC 7348, Layer 2 over Layer 3 overlay with 16 million VNIs, 50 bytes of overhead, the standard for data center and Kubernetes networking.

IPsec (Internet Protocol Security)

IETF standard suite (RFC 4301), AES-256-GCM encryption with certificate or PSK authentication, 60-90 bytes of overhead, the default for compliance-driven enterprise VPNs.

WireGuard

In the Linux kernel since 5.6 (2020), ChaCha20 encryption, 60 bytes of overhead, 3-4x the throughput of software IPsec with a fraction of the configuration.

Performance Benchmarks

Real-world performance data from 10 Gbps link testing

Throughput Test (10 Gbps link, single stream)

Baseline
9.8 Gbps
GRE
9.5 Gbps (97%)
VXLAN
8.9 Gbps (91%)
IPsec
4.2 Gbps (43%)
WireGuard
8.8 Gbps (90%)

Note: IPsec with hardware crypto acceleration (Intel QAT) reaches 9.2 Gbps (94% efficiency)

Latency Test (idle ping, 1ms baseline fiber link)

Baseline
0.8ms
GRE
+0.1ms (0.9ms)
VXLAN
+0.3ms (1.1ms)
IPsec
+1.5ms (2.3ms)
WireGuard
+0.5ms (1.3ms)

Latency increase primarily from encryption overhead (IPsec) and additional header processing

CPU Usage (1 Gbps sustained throughput)

GRE
5% CPU
VXLAN
8% CPU
IPsec
45% CPU
WireGuard
12% CPU

Hardware crypto acceleration significantly improves IPsec (reduces to 10% CPU)

Which Protocol

One line per protocol

  • GRE: private links that need multicast and minimal overhead.
  • VXLAN: data center overlays and Kubernetes networking at scale.
  • IPsec: compliance-driven enterprise VPNs and multi-vendor interop.
  • WireGuard: new deployments where performance and simple config matter most.

Hybrid Approaches

Combining protocols for the gaps each one leaves alone

GRE over IPsec
IPsec encrypts, GRE carries the multicast routing protocols IPsec alone cannot. Common in enterprise MPLS networks that need OSPF or EIGRP across a public link.
VXLAN with IPsec
VXLAN extends Layer 2 between data centers, IPsec encrypts the link. Used for VM mobility between sites where compliance requires encryption in transit.

For hub-and-spoke or mesh topologies across more than two sites, see multi-site connectivity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, it's common to run GRE inside IPsec (multicast + security), or have multiple tunnel types for different use cases (VXLAN for internal datacenter, IPsec for external site-to-site). Protocols can coexist on the same router/firewall.

Each protocol adds overhead: GRE 24B, VXLAN 50B, IPsec 60-90B, WireGuard 60B. Best practice: Enable Path MTU Discovery and set tunnel MTU = Physical MTU - Overhead. Typical: 1500B physical → 1476B GRE, 1450B VXLAN, 1410B IPsec. For VXLAN, use jumbo frames (9000B MTU) when possible.

Yes, WireGuard has been in the Linux kernel since 5.6 (2020) and has growing enterprise adoption. It's used in production by Cloudflare, Mullvad VPN, and Tailscale. However, IPsec still dominates for vendor interoperability and compliance reasons (many security frameworks specifically require IPsec).

GRE has no encryption. Options: (1) Only use over private networks (MPLS, dark fiber), (2) Wrap with IPsec (GRE over IPsec for multicast + security), (3) Use WireGuard instead (if multicast not needed). Never run raw GRE over public internet.

Modern SD-WAN solutions primarily use IPsec (vendor interoperability, compliance, maturity) or WireGuard (performance, simplicity, mobile support). Many vendors support both. Choose IPsec for multi-vendor environments, WireGuard for performance-critical or greenfield deployments.

For 10 Gbps link: GRE ≈ 97%, WireGuard ≈ 90%, VXLAN ≈ 91%, IPsec software ≈ 43%. IPsec with hardware crypto acceleration (Intel QAT, AES-NI) approaches GRE performance (94%). WireGuard is 3-4x faster than IPsec software encryption.

Ready to Deploy Secure Network Tunnels?

Our network engineering team will help you design and implement the optimal tunneling solution for your infrastructure.

View Network Services

Related Network Services

  • SD-WAN SolutionsIntelligent tunneling for multi-site networks with application-aware routing
  • Multi-Site ConnectivityComplete site-to-site connectivity strategies with redundant paths
  • L2 Wavelength & Dark FiberDedicated Layer 2 circuits and dark fiber for ultimate performance and control
Virtuasys

Enterprise connectivity, IP transit and colocation on a 100% European backbone.

AS35661 · RIPE NCC member

Connectivity
  • Enterprise Fiber
  • 10 Gbps Enterprise Fiber
  • FTTO vs FTTH
  • L2, Wavelength & Dark Fiber
  • Multi-Site Connectivity
  • SD-WAN Solutions
  • MPLS Solutions
  • Bandwidth on Demand
  • Tunneling (GRE/VXLAN/IPsec/WireGuard)
IP & Network
  • Tier-1 Connectivity
  • BGP & Peering
  • Internet Exchanges
  • DDoS Protection
  • Always-On DDoS Protection
  • Layer 7 DDoS Mitigation
  • Registry & RIPE
  • IPv4 Allocation
  • IPv4 Leasing
  • IPv6 Allocation
  • ASN Registration
  • RIPE Sponsorship
  • IP Transfer Services
  • Looking Glass
Datacenter & Cloud
  • Housing & Colocation
  • Colocation Paris
  • Colocation Lille
  • Rack Rental
  • Cage Hosting
  • Remote Hands
  • Cloud
  • Bare-Metal Servers
  • VPS SSD/NVMe
  • API Automation
  • Custom ISO Deployment
Company
  • About
  • Peering Policy
  • Contact
  • Abuse
  • Guides
  • Check Eligibility
  • Customer Portal
  • Legal notice
  • Privacy

100% European infrastructure · GDPR compliant · 24/7 NOC

© 2026 Virtuasys. All rights reserved.·Legal notice·Privacy·Part of ma2t holding